Sunday, 4 May 2014

WE ARE ALL ROLE MODELS


WHAT IS A ROLE MODEL?
The term role model generally means any "person who serves as an example; whose behaviour is emulated by others".
Other descriptions include:
A person whose behaviour, example or success is, or can be emulated by others, especially by young people
A person who someone admires and whose behaviour they try to copy

SURVEYS

The term first appeared in a research report of medical students carried out by Robert K. Merton, a distinguished American sociologist.


Merton suggested that individuals compare themselves with reference groups of people who occupy the social role to which the individual aspires.

Merton emphasised that, rather than a person assuming one role and one status, they have a status set within a social structure that has attached to it a whole set of expected behaviours.


According to a survey of teachers in the United Kingdom conducted in 2008 by the Association of Teachers and Lecturers young people frequently chose role models from celebrity or popular culture

CHOOSE TO BE A ROLE MODEL
A well-known ex-player and presenter on a national sports talk station, infamously perpetuates that professional players are not role models. That is not their job, nor is it one of the requirements of the position of professional player.
I strongly believe this is a flawed argument.
You can choose to act as a role model, or not. However, especially if you are in a position of influence or in the public eye, someone may deliberately, or sub-consciously, choose YOU as THEIR role model, whether or not you choose to ACT as a role model.
A PROFESSIONAL’S VIEW
When professional basketball player Charles Barkley stated in a commercial “I am not a role model”
Karl Malone of the Utah Jazz offered this simple response:
“We do not choose to be role models. We are chosen.”
Plato observed centuries ago that young people would imitate the behaviours of bad role models as readily as those of good role models
So, I believe that, as coaches and therefore directly in a position of at least some influence, it is important to recognise that we all have the ability to inspire those around us by demonstrating values that are more outwardly than inwardly focused.
We can do our part to make the world a better place, and to help and guide the players in our charge to be good and positive citizens through our daily actions. It is not only by what we say but more importantly by how we demonstrate positive behaviours that we hope will serve as an inspiration to others.
We can all be good role models when things are going well, but it is the behaviours we demonstrate and the adherence to our values and moral compass when things go less well that separate the GOOD role models from the role models.
5 Ways in which to ACT as a role model:
  • Be passionate (but controlled) about your area of expertise or interest and demonstrate inspirational behaviour
  • Develop and demonstrate a clear set of values (Integrity means doing the right thing even when no-one is watching !)
  • Show a commitment to community
  • Be selfless and show consideration for and acceptance of others
  • Demonstrate tenacity and an ability to overcome obstacles

“ No printed word, nor spoken plea can teach young minds what they should be.

Not all the books on all the shelves – but what the teachers are themselves.” -

Rudyard Kipling

Sources:



Tuesday, 16 July 2013

HAS “WINNING” BECOME A DIRTY WORD?


This latest post arises from some thoughts I exchanged with a coaching colleague on Twitter a couple of weeks ago (follow him on @coachbanter – and please also consider following @coachingfamily to exchange coaching ideas).

The original point arose from a question about “non-competitive” sports days and whether or not, as a nation, we develop ‘tough’ individuals.

The question itself comes from a point made in a Telegraph article on the role of Dan Ashworth, the FA’s recently appointed Director of Elite Development , which you can read here .
 
 
SO, WHAT IS “WINNING”?
 
This appears, on the face of it, to be a facile question. Surely, it is the team which, at the end of the period, has scored more goals than the other.
 
Possibly.
 
However, we now have available a plethora of statistics on all aspects of the game from a variety of sources and which are provided for us, especially at the top levels of the game, on TV and in match day programmes.
 
ARE THERE DIFFERENT WAYS TO DEFINE “WINNING”?
 
My previous blog post suggested that the number of goals scored in a game is a relatively infrequent occurrence in the game anyway compared to the number and type of passes, controlling touches, decisions, throws, saves, tackles, headers and so on.
 
 
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs)
 
In all forward looking enterprises, statistical analysis forms a significant pillar of measurement by which to judge progress.
 
This may range from profit and loss and the balance sheet of a business to departmental productivity targets and individual personal performance against agreed targets, usually at annual appraisal time.
 
Within this outline structure, there are clearly individual opportunities to succeed (win) against your individual targets even though the company targets may not necessarily be fully met over, say, a financial quarter.
 
So, then, what actions in the game can we measure to help re-define achievement that doesn’t rely purely on the final score?
 
Clearly there is a multitude, some of which are listed here and I am sure you can think of some others to add to the list:
 
  • Shots – On / Off Target
  • Assists (final pass leading to a goal)
  • Entries into the final third (NB ‘Reacher’ – An ‘entry’ is a considered, creative act, a ‘reacher’ is an, often, long kick into a forward area of the field, in the hope that one of your players will reach it before the opponent)
  • Completed passes
  • Forward passes
  • Sideways passes
  • Backwards passes
  • Diagonal passes
  • 1-2s / Wall passes
  • Successful turns
  • Successful dribbles
  • Retained the ball in a 1v1
  • No of touches per possession
  • Times played out from the back
  • Possessions progressed through the thirds of the pitch
  • How many members your club has
  • How many members are retained every year/season
  • How many new members are recruited every year/season
  • How many members leave each year….and why?
Etc., etc.
 
However, please consider:
·        WHY you are collecting information.
·        WHAT information is relevant to your club development plan/playing style/INDIVIDUAL player development
·        HOW you will use the data (developing practices,  recruitment / retention strategies to improve)
 
See this interesting video on You Tube form Mark Upton (Australian Rules Football Coach @uppy01 )  on one way of using KPIs in a sport environment.
 
 
IS WINNING MORE FUN?
 
So then the conversation moved to the question of whether or not it is more fun when players / teams win.
 
We rallied back and forth on finding the balance of fun and enjoyment, allowing everyone to participate and develop their skills.
 
We discussed the potential of a ruthless desire to win (A la Woods, Warne, Schumacher) and whilst that is probably true for those striving to achieve truly elite or top level professional sport, all other performers can raise their level of ability through attention to detail, desire to improve and with supportive coaching.
 
Also, we must take account of the place of the game in the players’ life landscape; are they keen to play but see the game as an enjoyable past-time, or are they striving to become a professional, or somewhere in between?
 
Anecdotally, the ‘will to win’ can the difference between good players remaining ‘good’ and less competent players 'making it', through increased desire and application.
 
Whilst it may be in vogue to say "it's all about development", as coaches, surely we are absolutely concerned with development – development of the individual and of the team (though the team’s individuals may change over the seasons).
 
But what are we developing towards?
 
Style, competency, game understanding, ball mastery, expertise… winning? That development may take years but ‘winning’ is ultimately a natural outcome of good development, I believe.
 
RE-DEFINING “WINNING”
 
So I think it is important that we begin to look at how we define “winning”.
 
If we take individual or team targets (which should be AGREED with the player / team, not just ‘set’ by the coach) based upon improving measureable actions within a game or on the practice field and arrived at through analysis that helps our playing style or player competence.
 
Players can then begin to experience a sense of achievement and to build self-esteem as they see they can attain agreed, yet stretching, targets. It also helps to develop a growth mindset as they find that the more they practice with intent to improve, the better they will become – a valuable life skill.
 
HAS “WINNING” BECOME A DIRTY WORD?
 
So, no, I don't think winning has become a dirty word. I think it is a natural consequence of appropriate development...….and all of competence, determination, development, mastery, practice and style come before "winning" in the dictionary!
 
 
You may be interested in this article Winning:How Important is it in Youth Sports (taken from the www.footy4kids.co.uk website).
 
Please feel free to leave comments.